this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2025
594 points (98.5% liked)

Not The Onion

16858 readers
2556 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  • Will have a driver in the "robo" taxi
  • Will need to only run on specific area at specific time frame
  • Won't run in "bad" weather
  • Has all other kinds of small rules and quirks.

This seems like a complete waste of time for everyone involved.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

It's almost like it's a grift for government contracts

[–] Showroom7561 50 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So..... A regular taxi, then? 🤔🤭😂😂😂😂

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, this will be less convenient and more expensive. Like the tesla tunnel thing in Vegas: subway, but much worse.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

The autonomous taxis near me are legit more expensive than lift and Uber, the only time I tried to use it at least.

They've also got agents watching you inside the autonomous taxi at all times, so that's fun.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

This is even worse than I expected. I expected another delay, or a autonomous taxi with a remote driver constantly monitoring at best. This is no better than a regular taxi.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Elon spent all this money on making a taxi that drives itself but needs a driver and only works some of the time.

Elon is a genius.....

[–] [email protected] 271 points 2 days ago (10 children)

So it's a taxi.

Motherfucker loves trying to reinvent the wheel only to end up at the goddamn wheel.

"I'ma invent a giant system that goes underground so we can move people around faster!" That's a subway, you santorum-covered condom.

[–] [email protected] 95 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Par for the course for techbros. His hyperloop was a shittier train. UberPool is a shittier bus. All these dumbfucks grow up being told they're the specialest boys, so of course people who made better things before them were clearly wrong.

[–] [email protected] 78 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hyperloop was a raging success - it stopped funding of railway. I believe he even admitted that this was behind it to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Luckily only in Murica.

The liberal parties here tried to make the same argument here, but luckily no one takes them seriously (in Europe this means something different, than in the US. It's not progressive/left-leaning, they are more like Libertarians/Republicans. They don't hate gay people, but hate paying taxes and regulations)

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Motherfucker loves trying to reinvent the wheel only to end up at the goddamn wheel.

A shittier version of the wheel.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Isn't the Cybertruck steering wheel called a squircle?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Hahahaha

Edit: oh fuck I thought you were just making a joke. Jesus fucking Christ.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Terrible name for a terrible design. Yoke style steering wheels are not safe for cars because they create awkward handholds as they rotate.

Yoke style works in planes and race cars where they aren't rotated 360+ degrees regularly, rarely over 90 degrees either direction.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I cringed. I don't know if you made that up or not, and the fact that I genuinely can't tell made me sad for this stupid timeline.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

Apparently it fucking is. God I hate everything.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So just a regular Taxi then.....groundbreaking.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago

He did it again. Except now you have a shitty robo taxi with a driver that pays no attention. The worst of both worlds.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago

if he innovates even more he might eventually invent trains!

[–] [email protected] 63 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Imagine that job though. It is your job to be a scapegoat for traffic collisions.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Fantastic use of traffic collision, great reference.

"Accident implies there's nobody to blame."

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 days ago

For ‘driving’ reasons.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

More fraud.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Will the driver be dressed like Optimus?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago

I must say, it's been a little nicer not having this dipshit in the headlines every single fucking day. I guess he's going to start saying things again and fuck with my peace of mind.

I think Musk should 100% trust his fucking piece of shit robotaxi tech and use it exclusively. Good chance it drives him off a bridge.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I thought it was a 2 seater with no controls. Lemme guess... It's a fleet of Model 3s.

[–] Archangel1313 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The driver fits in the trunk.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

SMH not even 700 ppl remote working in India like Amazon

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Waymo doesn't need it, but he does? lol

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That's because Tesla self-driving takes a different, and imo way worse, approach.

Waymo relies on mapping, the entire city is basically 3D modelled and loaded into the car memory. It's more or less 'on rails'. It also uses LIDAR for live data alongside imaging cameras, again building a 3D model of its environment combined with image recognition.

Tesla decided that, for some reason, they want their cars to drive 'like humans', only relying on vision and deployable anywhere, without pre-mapping.

Demanding a computer to behave like humans, instead of using a computer's strengths, seems like a very poorly thought out move to me.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

drive 'like humans', only relying on vision […] without pre-mapping.

Demanding a computer to behave like humans

So basically their taxis will go into the job of driving a taxi without any prior knowledge of the city? Like a human? Only relying on road signs? Will it also stop to ask for directions? Like wtf? What kind of stupid idea is this from Tesla. Sounds absolutely moronic.

A human taxi driver doesn't work like this. They are people who know the city very well going in, or at least used to before GPS navigation in vehicles came to aid.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He's famously said that humans are good enough with just our two eyes. So he went the cheap route of not including lidar and relying on stereoscopic cameras.

He's an idiot. Because when I want stuff automated, I want it to be better than what a human can do.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

humans are good enough with just our two eyes

This requires the car to have an equally sophisticated visual cortex as well, which we cannot achieve right now. Cars need those better sensors to equal our abilities.

God, hearing his stupid arguments shows us he really knows nothing about anything.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Because he seems to base his ideas purely on how cool he thinks they are rather than practicality and efficiency (such as the hidden tesla door handles).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

Waymo also has much more reliable tech. To my knowledge waymos are level 4 while Tesla is only level 2 (which doesn't even qualify as autonomous)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Waymo have laser beams on their heads.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The "human driver" in question:
Doug, the main character from the movie "Total Recall", ripping the Johnny humanoid robot out of its socket.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

yeah, totally not to keep the robotaxis from being molotoved. although after what musk did, not sure the presence of drivers will stop people.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago

More like: "If a "driver" is present and the car decides to kill someone, we can blame it on the human instead of the shoddy programming"

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

I'm planning to launch a human-only taxi service, but to cut costs the humans will be AI.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

More like Hobotaxi, am I right?

Or Nobotaxi, if that's funnier. Whichever you like is fine.

load more comments
view more: next ›