this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
729 points (99.1% liked)

politics

24370 readers
3729 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The New York Young Republican Club (NYYRC) has called on the federal government to strip Zohran Mamdani of his citizenship and deport him.

On Tuesday evening, Mamdani, a 33-year-old self-described democratic socialist, declared victory over Andrew Cuomo, former governor of the state of New York, in the Democratic primary for the 2025 New York mayoral election.

The outcome, one of the first major Democratic primaries since Donald Trump returned to office, is being considered as a barometer for the party's potential recalibration nationally, at a time when it remains ideologically divided about its future.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SirMaple__ 39 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (9 children)

Yeah that's not going to happen. Zohran Mamdani is in no way a threat to the US. Period.

If it did happen I bet LA this last month will look like a slumber party compared to what will happen as a result of this actually happening.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 105 points 14 hours ago

They really are afraid. Very good.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 12 hours ago

If he does. Time for even more mass protests. Shut down the streets of New York until his citizenship is restored.

[–] [email protected] 392 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

This shows how scared they are of him. This is a bellwether moment.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 hours ago

Exactly, people were talking about controlled opposition and it looks like it is true.

If they thought he was so left he had no chance they would just laugh or even ignore (which normally they did not pay attention to primaries).

[–] [email protected] 218 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

these people are afraid of everything

[–] [email protected] 124 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That is the core characteristic of ALL Conservatives - Fear. They are so afraid of EVERYTHING, that they want to preserve the safe little bubble they are in right now. ANY change is to be feared, and attacked.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

It's almost understandable until you realize it's not just change for themselves they fear, it's change for anyone else. Somehow, in their twisted minds, an increase in rights and humane treatment for others hurts them.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

It’s because they fear they will lose their social “status” of being “better” than someone else. Because if everyone is the same then they can’t be “better”

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 hours ago

"When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression"

[–] [email protected] 29 points 15 hours ago

Conservatives see the world as a zero sum. In order for one group of people to gain rights, another group has to lose rights.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 15 hours ago

Exactly. Authoritarianism is driven by two things, fearful followers who want to combat their fear with control, and social dominator leaders who take advantage of fearful followers for their own benefit.

Here is an entire free book full of research on the topic.

https://theauthoritarians.org/

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 84 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

In 1954, President Dwight Eisenhower signed the Communist Control Act into law. In theory, this outlawed the Communist Party of the United States and banned communists from serving in certain roles.

WTF

[It passed because] many opposed communism because of its explicitly declared and historically demonstrable goal to undermine liberal democracy. In the words of Ernest van den Haag, there was "no place in democracy for those who want to abolish [it] even with a peaceful vote".

  • Wikipedia

The irony of using it here would be palpable

[–] [email protected] 20 points 12 hours ago

The freedest country on earth.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 12 hours ago

That would get so much push back. I think it's more likely Mamdani receives the highest award in journalism l, unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 243 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (10 children)

I am becoming increasingly sick of seeing the word 'deport' being used by Republicans who are suggesting revoking citizenship and a banishment. It's exile.

[–] [email protected] 101 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

"We are all domestic terrorists"

They already told us who they are, and nothing they've done would indicate otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 17 hours ago (23 children)

it's also like the most Un-American thing you could possibly imagine

[–] [email protected] 43 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (4 children)

Rounding people up because of their ethnicity is actually very American. It happened in the 1800s, the 1940s, and the 1950s. Just to name a few.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] CircaV 59 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Appalling. Only the repugnicans would stoop this low. He’s been American since 2018. If they succeed in this - the US is truly Germany in the early 1930s.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The US is already there. We arrived about 2-3 months ago.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago

I think we're like at the stage right after hitler becomes chanceller and right before the Enabling Act.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

What will the average non-bootlicking american will do if this happens? I have hope that this kind of event would be the trigger for the passive majority to actually resist.

[–] WizardofFrobozz 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They will do absolutely nothing, just as they have at every other step of the takeover.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You seriously need to change your news sources.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Do it. This would trigger the uprising we need.

[–] kent_eh 37 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

This would trigger the uprising we need.

Would it, though?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Citizenship is a contract that gives you protection in exchange for some expectations to participate in the community.

Revoking citizenship is a huge deal. Not easily done, and I don't think its even used as a punishment.

If they were to? Then they'll happily revoke it for anyone who dissents with the regime.

[–] corsicanguppy 13 points 10 hours ago

Revoking citizenship is a huge deal. Not easily done, and I don't think its even used as a punishment.

".. use of denaturalization ... is a form of punishment more primitive than torture ... " -- Trop v. Dulles, 1958, denaturalization unsuitable punishment for 1944 wartime military desertion.

The use of it as an arbitrary tool to instill fear and chill participation in public office should immediately be addressed as uttering threats as a mob.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

yeah I'm down to start some shit if they do

[–] [email protected] 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If they will revoke citizenship for one they will be happy to revoke it for anyone.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago

They can revoke these nutz

[–] [email protected] 82 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

I doubt it. We've already tolerated a near complete collapse of the rule of law and masked goon squads kidnapping people in the streets. Disappearing one more brown guy probably isn't going to move that needle much.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 hours ago

New Yorkers are a hard bunch. I would expect some enthusiastic protest if their guy got taken from them before he could even get in office.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Revoking citizenship is an extreme move. They don't even revoke citizenship of criminals.

This would be crossing a line they are unlikely to even understand.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's illegal under international law. Because it creates a stateless person, which is a huge problem

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

He technically wouldn't be stateless since he's (according to the Wikipedia page) a dual citizen of US and Uganda.

Edit: To clarify, it would still be a violation of the US constitution to use trumped-up accusations to denaturalize someone, but its technically not against international laws.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Millions of people around the country turned out to protest that, and the protests are ongoing. Also, this isn’t “one more brown guy,” he’s one of the most visible politicians in the country right now.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago

Yeah, it also looks like it actually increased participation in LA, which the ICE, NG and Marines supposed to scare

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] grte 86 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Don't Republicans hate New York? You'd think they'd be thrilled with the opportunity for socialism to ruin one of the bluest cities in the US. Maybe they're worried something else will happen.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 85 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (5 children)

Do Republicans Know What Communism Is?

Short answer: No.

More precise answer: They don't have a fucking clue.

Most relevant answer: No and they don't really care, but they will still call you a communist and kick you out of the country if you annoy them.

Edit to add archive.ph link if desired.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 75 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

As a perpetually online individual I could swear that "conservatives" absolutely hated "thought crime" and political persecution for their beliefs...

Ohhhhh right, hypocrisy. I almost forgot. "Conservatives" use words as weapons and are only consistent in their inconsistent stated beliefs.

[–] floofloof 40 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

The White House has framed the upset victory by Mamdani, who could become New York City's first Muslim and Indian American mayor, as evidence of uncontrolled migration...

And by "uncontrolled migration" they mean "brown people getting uppity and not knowing their place."

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›