this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
511 points (97.4% liked)

News

30526 readers
3504 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

He is much closer to his stated goal

The power to deport any natural Born Citizen on demand for no reason at all

He has stated he wants.... Needs this

On Exactly why he has been vague

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

That means him first motherfucker because Trump is a birthright citizen. His grandfather was an immigrant.

Not like me is like 12 generations removed but still immigrant. Except on my mother's side that native American. But guess Trump will deport them too, because if you got technical they also are immigrants.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's still a right embedded in the constitution. The supreme court didn't say he could do it....but the orange Cheetos in chief probably thinks they did because his mother gave birth to him at the top of a ladder

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Wait ... Doesn't "citizenship" mean where you're born?

It's either where you're born or where you live. Which is it?

Wtf even is citizenship then?

"I'm from Ireland" is synonymous with "I'm Irish"... Right?

So if you're born in America, wouldn't you... Be American?

If he takes that away, you aren't just magically from nowhere, you're still American.

This is stupid and makes no sense, it's all just classism and racism. I hate everything.

[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Its the same as the election between Obama and McCain, in ways a lot of people dont realize.

Obama, by virtue of having a non-traditional name and not being white, was hounded by birthers despite being born an American citizen clear as day with absolutely no question about it.

McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone the year before people born in the canal zone were granted citizenship at birth. Arguably he was not a citizen at birth under the definitional requirements of the constitution to be president. He was naturalized as a citizen retroactively.

Palin is part native, and was pretty heavily involved with Alaska Native movements that rejected US sovereignty and thereby rejected claims to citizenship. But no one talked about that either because shes also largely seen as just being a white American.

And yet Obama, who was American thru and thru from birth without question, never was involved with Hawaiian sovereignty movements, is the one whos citizenship was questioned.

“White makes right” is the rule of law to these people

[–] ILikeBoobies 17 points 23 hours ago

Ted Cruz ran in the Republican presidential primary despite being an Albertan

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

Sounds about white.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Doesn’t “citizenship” mean where you’re born?

Only in the new world continents. In Africa, Europe, and Asia it normally means what country your parents and grandparents are from, unless someone in the chain naturalises to a different country.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 21 hours ago

Yup, and when you don’t have any citizenship, you’re stateless. It causes a lot of issues internationally, because a stateless person can’t have a passport, can’t immigrate, can’t hold a legal job because they can’t get a work visa without a passport, etc… Notably, the US is one of the few countries that refused to sign on with the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness. Basically, the convention would prevent a country from revoking someone’s citizenship if they don’t have a valid claim elsewhere. And the US refused to sign.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The thing about ending birthright citizenship is that it would just create a stateless individual. Where would they even deport children of undocumented immigrants to? Are they going to make an El Salvadorian gulag for them too?

The former SCOTUS ruling on the 14th amendment was really clear - if you are born here, you are a citizen regardless of your parent's legal immigration status. I don't understand why the SCOTUS is even bothering to hear this case when even a constitutional literalist would have difficulty trying to weasel-word their way into a ruling that supports the Republican position on this one.

I can thing of few things more cruel than a state that looks at a literal child who was born here, lived here all their lives, speaks the language, attends school, has friends and family and a support structure and would otherwise be indistinguishable from any other American child born to American-born parents, and deport them to a country they've never set foot in for no real discernible reason other than they are anti-immigrant racists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Most people are citizens of where they also live and give birth so this distinction doesn't come up in most cases. But for children born to immigrants or travelers it does.

Citizenship can either be assigned by where you were born, or who you were born to.

Birthright citizenship, as we use the term in the US, is mostly a new world invention. In nearly all countries in the americas, any children born here are citizens without exception. No matter the parents, no matter the circumstances.

In the old world, most countries require a parent to be a citizen in order for the child to also be a citizen.

Generally if an american couple gives birth in Europe, the child will just be american, despite where they were born. If a European couple gives birth in any of the americas, their child will be a citizen of the americas, despite anything else

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You operate under the assumption that this is a public service. That would make no sense.

But if the assumption is them accumulating more power, then it makes perfect sense.

To be honest I get more mad at people being surprised by their actions. At this point it is so obvious what is happening and why. How can anyone be surprised by any of this?

"Why does this rabid dog bites? How does this make for a better world?"

It is a rabid dog, how could you ever expect something positive to begin with? Put it down already. You don't argue with crazy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 day ago (8 children)

At what point does everyone say "if he's not following the law, then neither should we"?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago

I came to that conclusion when he won the election despite his numerous crimes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago

I break laws all the time now. They have no meaning. It's like the wild west now

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Guilty. I've stolen 2 elections already and dogwhistled so much

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Can you please just give them back? We've been looking for them literally everywhere

Also, those whistles give me a headache

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

As long as it doesn't immediately result in you dead or in jail.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

At what point are you willing to sacrifice your life for your cause?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 233 points 1 day ago (9 children)

This is the final nail in the coffin of the Constitution. As a lawyer for the federal government, I need everyone to know that this officially marks the end of United States rule of law. Protect yourselves, and godspeed.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm coping so hard by hoping that we swing very hard to the left, if only just so that these cynical, fossilized assholes live to see their bullshit rulings used against them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Billionaires and politicians. No one else matters. Don't be distracted by the broke Nazis at ICE. The true threat numbers in the hundreds.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

Moron is literally BEGGING

[–] [email protected] 110 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (18 children)

Lest we forget:

Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Pretty hard to argue that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside” doesn’t mean what it clearly states. It’s not even in legalese. The fact that this wasn’t laughed out of court says everything.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, the 2nd amendment is clearly only about militias, but you can see how that went.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

States need to criminalize the behavior of ICE officers and start arresting them en masse. ICE agents will be free to challenge their imprisonment individually.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I saw a person trying to all caps "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" screaming that this specific clause somehow is the piece that excludes birthright citizenship because something something loyalty to other countries?

[–] theacharnian 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

So like ....kids of illegal aliens are ... sovereign citizens?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's what the Constitution says, and Trump now has nothing that can legally stop him from doing it.

Which means the Constitution is dead letter.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 136 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So literally what happened here is Trump said, "I want to violate the Constitution" and the Supreme Court said, " Okay — go ahead."

And that's it for the rule of law in the US.

All that's left now is to tally the mass murders along the way to the inevitable collapse of the US, and to hope that our descendents can build something better out of the rubble.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

The US collapsing is going to absolutely affect the rest of the world. This is very VERY bad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

On unrelated news, what would happen if people stopped paying federal taxes?

I.e., if all of california, or blue states in general, stopped paying federal taxes simultaneously, what would realistically be the outcome?

How would it affect the US? How would it affect the states?

And: Is there a proper place to discuss ideas such as this one?


My (very rough) understanding is that people pay income taxes to the federal tax agency directly. From there, the central US government sends parts of it back to the states, to do things with it such as public services.

Blue states are more economically heavy than red states. They pay in more than they get out. If they stop paying taxes, the US suffers but they get to keep a larger share to themselves? My understanding is very rough, it's just a rough idea.

It could weaken Trump's government?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

This is fucking Stephen Miller's Nazi wet dream

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›