I totally agree on the toasting, but note that it means the oats take longer to cook in the water. Also, I use a 2:1 ratio of water:milk instead of just water.
Also, also, I add a handful of rolled oats when the steel cut oats are nearly done.
I totally agree on the toasting, but note that it means the oats take longer to cook in the water. Also, I use a 2:1 ratio of water:milk instead of just water.
Also, also, I add a handful of rolled oats when the steel cut oats are nearly done.
I remember that you could get close to this by running the same card into the keypunch several times, typing different things each time.
I don't know anything about journaling, but the Platinum pen in the picture is an amazing, yet inexpensive fountain pen.
It seems more rikely, if hit by an IBM truck in 1985 that he would be ebcdic'd to Seattle.
Nope. Collusion is not allowed.
The PACs aren't the issue, it's that they are allowed unlimited spending. In Canada, where I live, third party spending is capped at $350K per registered partisan group.
You are forgetting that other countries respond with tariffs of their own. Ultimately, the outcome balances out, just with higher prices for everyone. Local producers that rely on exports lose while those that sell locally win - as long as they don't rely on imports for raw materials.
Consumers lose, especially on stuff that will never be produced locally, or rules on raw materials that can't be sourced locally.
FWIW: It never even occured to me that they might have meant removing speed limits. I had to go back and re-read it a few times to see what the beef was.
Context is important here. Sure, "drop" could mean two things, but anything other than "lowering" in this case wouldn't make sense. IMHO, at least.
No way. When something numerical is "dropped" it usually means lowered. Especially in the form "drop numerical value", as was this case.
Maybe...but two things:
If the number of obese people is lower, then what are the people who aren't mildly overweight? They are healthy weight. So even if the percentage of mildly overweight people stay the same, the day to day comparison is with a bigger group of healthy weight people, so they probably were more recognizably overweight.
Secondly, with less really obese people you wouldn't get desensitized to seeing fat all the time, which makes mildly overweight people seem more normal. Somebody with a BMI of 26 and about 15lbs overweight would have been more likely to be described as "plump" or "husky" back then. But when crowds are full of people that are 50+ lbs overweight, that 26 BMI seems downright healthy.
This is all speculation. I can't remember how I perceived overweight vs obese people back in the 80's.
That's the thing 40 years ago you would realize that they were overweight.
Written by a Canadian Much Music VJ.