this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
73 points (96.2% liked)

Canada

9730 readers
821 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

[https://archive.ph/Gz69T](archived link)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Canadian individuals who own U.S. securities directly are subject to a 15-per-cent withholding tax rate under the current treaty, reduced from the statutory rate of 30 per cent. If section 899 were to become law, the withholding rate could ultimately rise to 50 per cent.

Ian Bragg, vice-president of research and statistics at the Securities and Investment Management Association, said that the current draft of the legislation could cost Canadian investors more than $81-billion in additional taxes over seven years.

“These measures would penalize ordinary Canadians saving for retirement, education, or other long-term goals, and create unnecessary uncertainty in the market,” Mr. Bragg said in an e-mailed statement. “It’s critical that this issue be addressed at the highest levels of Canada-U.S. trade discussions to protect the savings and financial security of millions of Canadians.”

Max Reed, a cross-border tax lawyer and principal of Polaris Tax Counsel in Vancouver, said if the bill is enacted, section 899 would “rupture” the Canada-U.S. tax relationship the same way that Trump‘s tariffs have impaired the Canada-U.S trade relationship.

“The results would be significant,” Mr. Reed said in an online post to clients. “Virtually all cross-border planning would be turned on its head.”

The tax bill also removes long-standing tax exemptions for governments and related entities from targeted companies. That means organizations such as the Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board and First Nation communities could be required to pay tax.

For Canada’s multinational companies with operations in the U.S., the proposed tax changes will place them at a competitive disadvantage to domestic U.S. companies and to subsidiaries of other foreign multinationals that don’t have similar discriminatory taxes, said Ron Nobrega, a tax partner at Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP in Toronto.

[–] Arghblarg 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Paywalled, can't read it.

Does this mean I would pay taxes just for holding US securities (eg., stocks in US companies)? Or only when selling? Does it make any difference which brokers are used?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If the stock in your RRSP pays dividends, those dividends may be taxed 50% if an alternate agreement isn't reached.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I believe it’s just the withholding tax for dividends. It doesn’t mention in the article if this would affect US stocks in RRSPs, which are exempt from the withholding tax.

[–] uninvitedguest 2 points 1 week ago

This sounds incorrect to me.

Withholding taxes are taxes at the source of the income. If a country stipulates that a foreign investor is subject to a 30% withholding tax on dividends, it doesn't matter the tax shelter status of your investment account - That money is never even going to land in your RRSP as it will be withheld at the source. If there is a tax treaty in place, you can apply afterwards to get some of your tax back.

Am I missing a key function here?

[–] Arghblarg 1 points 1 week ago

Thank you for the info.