Mountain house with a hot tub. Then I don't even need a bug out location for the upcoming civil war π
Plus, I can get more animals and a bigger garden.
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
62 points (97.0% liked)
Casual Conversation
2814 readers
290 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Donβt ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@lemm.ee
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The house with a pool if someone else would take care of the maintenance without me needing to worry about it. Otherwise the beach house, I would imagine it would be the easiest to rent out and use that income to get a house I would actually like.
In the real world Iβd take the mountain house. In a fantasy world where rising sea levels arenβt a thing to worry about Iβd take the beach house.
I like mountains fine but the sea calms my soul like nothing else.
the sea calms my soul
As long as you don't look under the surface.
Oceans be scary. (but still great, that's why I joined the navy once)
load more comments
(4 replies)
mountain house, immediately
Even without the hot tub but especially with.
Initially, I imagined itβs a cozy cottage in the middle of nowhere, but then I remembered that Switzerland exists. You could totally have some shops only a few tram stops away.
Mountain house with a hot tub. Climate change and rising water levels makes a beachfront house a poor idea, and nobody sane would want to live in suburbia. You won't have to deal with a HOA in the mountains, and who doesn't want a hot tub with a magnificent view?
Soon the mountain house might be a beach house and crowded neighborhood.
Yeah, but figurative drowning still beats the literal kind. Barely.
A home in the mountains. Hot tub optional.
Becoming a mountain hermit is one of my pipe dreams, so easily the mountain. Hot tub is irrelevant but I guess if it's included I'll take it.
Beach house, without question. I spent my summers growing up on a lake. Every day I woke up to the light reflecting onto the ceiling from the waves. I fell asleep listening to waves lapping at the seawall. It's probably the most content and relaxed I've ever been. Could just be nostalgia for a life (and the teenage lifestyle) and people long gone, but to live that way again when I retire is my fondest wish. Probably out of reach, but I can dream.
Lots of fucking spiders on and in a beach house, though, lol. I still have nightmares about the way you'd sometimes open the sliding glass door and three or four fat ones would immediately drop down, I guess drawn by the temperature difference? So listen, beach houses are fucking awful. None of you should want one. If you have one, you probably want to leave. I'd be willing to take it off your hands at a discount.
Could I get a mountain house without a hot tub? I don't want to have to maintain one of those petri dishes.
Mountain house and in pretty indifferent about the hot tub. I just want to be in the mountains.
If weβre talking Pacific Ocean and no climate change yep that one hands down. No thanks to a pool, hot tubs can be fun but really just eh after a time. Beach is life man.
Mountain house without a hot tub. Although I'd accept a natural hot spring in the garden.
The first thing that came to mind when I read the question is maintenance lol. Salt is bad for a lot of things, and maintaining a pool is expensive. If the hot tub in the mountain was manual, probably that?
Mountain House if solar/wind are feasible and I have sufficient clearing to grow my own food.
Otherwise, regular house.
I like mountains, hiking, biking, and I want to become self-sufficient where possible. And my wife wants cows and chickens, I don't think they would do well on a beach, especially when sea levels start noticeably rising.
Beach! Walk in that sand. Hear those waves. Plop your drink down anywhere and it'll stand up. Take a dip. Enjoy as much as possible until humanity ruins every drop.
Most drinks will stand up anywhere you put them
Ha, attend enough bands in lots of local bars. I can assure you, lots of drinks end up on the floor. Plopping one on the beach is way better.
Is the house with a pool in a swamp, or possibly a bog?
Because you're a witch?
Mountain one. The tub would sit unused, but the hot water would be useful
If utilities and internet speed and stuff are a non-issue (all things are equal), mountain house.
Otherwise, beach house.
Honestly, I like swimming, but I'd rather have a normal ass house than have to deal with pool maintenance.
Currently got a beach (holiday) house and I could never imagine switching it with a mountain house/cabin or just a pool. Waking up in the summer to the sound of sea gulls and taking a fresh morning bath in the ocean can't be beat.
A mountain cabin would be the second choice. I got an uncle who built his own cabin in the mountains after retiring, it's nice and quiet, but other than hikes there's isn't much to do.
Just go to the local swimming hall if you want a pool.
Lake house
Mountain house, more things to do(gardens etc) and of course relax.
If there's good surf at the beach house, that. Otherwise mountain house with hot tub. Pools get boring and are annoying to maintain.
I don't want a pool but of those choices I'll take the pool. Don't want to live in the middle of nowhere in the mountains, and I love the beach but the beach keeps shrinking, soon enough that's not a house on the beach. Houses with pools all over here, it's common enough so I guess insurable.
mountain house with hot tub! I hate sand
Definitely not the beach house. I'm kinda torn between the other two. Pools are a ton of maintenance time and/or cost. I could heat a pool, but I can't swim in a hottub. Short term, mountains could be cut off or impassable in (probably much longer than at lower elevations) winter. Long term, it might be the better pick for climate change, but not if there's no community around it.
load more comments
(3 replies)
I'm torn between the beach house and the mountain house. I love the beach and would love to be able to wake up and wander out into the waves. Especially if the beach features tropical waters and soft, rock free, sand. Though, this home could easily be monkey pawed by placing the house on some rock strew nightmare of a beach with cold waters (or the opposite, for those folks into foot killing beaches). That said, such a beach house would invariably be overrun during the tourist season, and hell being other people, this would greatly reduce the joy of living there.
The mountain home, on the other hand, offers a wonderful sense of solitude. And skinny dipping with the wife in a hot tub is a fantastic way to start an autumn evening. Though, even in the mountains, you can find subdivisions where the houses are piled on top of each other and the "sense of solitude" has trouble being maintained with the neighbors plainly visible though the trees. And once you get into full blown winter, the cold can start to wear on you. So again, possibly a mixed bag, depending on the specific circumstances.
So ya, I guess I'd take the beach house and just take vacations to somewhere else during the high season. Maybe set it up as an AirBnB or the like for those times. Though, the idea of random strangers doing gods know what on my mattress kinda creeps me out. Guess I'd need a storage unit with rental furniture to swap out during those times as well.
A mountain house with a pool, looking down at a beach.
Also, with enough tree clearance, and a pool cleaning robot that doubles as a high-pressure fire sprinkler.
That would depend I guess. I don't typically enjoy those kinds of things (perhaps bringing up my fear of depths and that I can't swim), and so the question arises of who it would be for. Visitors? Maybe this would influence whether I choose the first two, but as it stands, I choose the last one.
None of the above in the real world; too much maintenance on any of them.
But in a hypothetical world where I didn't have to do the work, or pay for it? I'll take the pool.
A good swim without dealing with tides and whatever trash is floating around trumps the other two options
Im with the fedditor who said well only if hypothetical as likely all options are to expensive. Thing is that I would take the beach house as top except for sea level rise would put me off. Of course if Im super rich maybe I don't care about having to buy a new place super soon. Next would be the mountain house but only if for some reason it was close enough to a city to have transit and stuff around, which is unlikely but maybe exists in colorado or something (same would apply to the beach house but I think its much more likely to have that in beach vs moutains). In all reality I would actually prefer the house or condo with a pool as it could likely be located in a nice city with good transit. Honestly I would prefer a great indoor hottub and sauna than the pool.
Whichever is easiest to get groceries to.
I really wanted a cottage on an island in a lake in Ontario or Finland but getting food and stuff there is such a pain.
I want to live in a walkable, urban, area, so probably the beach house. Maybe down by Coney Island.
Mountain house with a hot tub. Hands down. Assuming I am the one purchasing the property with my own money, of course.
-
Beach House: The beach gets boring after a while. Beachfront property cost 2-3 times more than comparable property.
-
House with a pool: Pools get crazy boring after a while. It's just a hole in the ground with water in it. A house with a pool is cheaper than a beach house so assuming you have the same amount of money you get way more house for the same money. Better than a beach house, but a pool, specifically an in-ground pool is a permanent commitment. I have a pool. Nobody uses it. I just maintain it.
-
Mountain house with a hot tub: Have you been to the mountains? Holy crap. It's BEAUTIFUL. Also, just like the house with a pool, you can afford waaay more house than some dinky beachfront house for the same money. Also, when you get bored with the hot tub, just tear it out and put in a nice fire pit.
A beach house since it's less maintenance than pool house. I wouldn't do mountain house though since I don't live in a place that has them, and when I've visited places that do, I've always gotten dizzy and sick from the high altitude.
Beach house β less maintenanceβ¦?
Lol.
Salt eats everything, moisture rots it all, sand has no concept of personal space and will grit and invade everything.
Unless the beach house is at least 3 to 5km away from the shore, you will spend a ton of time and money in constant repairs and maintenance.
I was thinking a freshwater beach. I don't live anywhere near an ocean, but I do live near a bunch of lakes. Yes, the house could be built in a bad location where it ends up flooding, but if it's on a hill near the lake, then it is fine.