this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
37 points (97.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

31808 readers
1627 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You get to keep only enough to maintain a very modest lifestyle in a low-cost-of-living area, the rest of it has to go towards improving the world in some way.

Edit: Given the previous rules that you must maintain a very modest lifestyle in a low-cost-of-living area, would you rather choose to opt out and not have the money at all?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 minutes ago

I would donate the vast majority to education in the rest of homelessness

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Move to an undisclosed remote location and start posting massive crypto bounties on the heads of the shittiest people in the world. Like, $100M a pop. Pay a digital sweatshop to spam social media with AI generated posts and memes about it until the whole world is aware. Then wait. See if anyone is able to collect.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 hours ago

Best that I can think of would be to create an endowed institute of political scientists, psychologists, neuroscientists, linguists, et cetera, dedicated to studying and developing ways to counter right-wing populism, and de-program people who fall under its sway.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

Change it into British pounds, set up a political party or movement.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

I set up a for profit corporation whose stated goal is to make the world a better play. I donate all the money to that corporation.

As the sole owner, I now have 5 billion dollars so I change the mission to something else because I don't have time to deal with the poors who did work as hard as me to become this successful.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 hours ago

distribute guillotines

[–] [email protected] 59 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Wholesale murder of my fellow billionaires

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Great idea! But what happens then? There'd be some fear, but more importantly, a certain vacuum of power. How could you make sure another power-hungry, sociopathic populist wouldn't rise? Or, again more importantly, make sure people cannot fall into these traps again, which only happens due to a lack of ideology, generalized ignorance and a belief in 'moral relativism' (among other issues)?

Btw, Frank Herbert explored this in Dune... it requires a virtually immortal prophet! 😅

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 minutes ago

Great idea! But what happens then?

Not my problem because I would have to die too.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

People who seek power being more scared that being exploitative has consequences, so they limit exploitation.

It took hundreds of years of revolts to get from absolute monarchies to representative systems in most European countries. You could argue the French revolution failed because it was succeeded by Napoleon. You could also understand it as an important step forward.

Take another example in Europe. Initial plans were to create an US style capitalism in Western Germany after WW2. However it was understood this would create a large class of disenfranchised and poor people. This would have given communism a chance to become the dominating ideology in Europe. So instead capitalism had to be coated with social security, access to opportunities by education, access to home ownership... Structures that were subsequently damaged and destroyed after the collapse of the Soviet Union as now the ruling class thought themselves to be able to exploit people with impunity. Something that will fail eventually, but get much worse until then.

It is like brushing your teeth. Yes they will get dirty again. But not having the perfect solution to keep them clean forever cannot dissuade you from brushing them regularly. On the contrary it makes it all the more important to keep brushing them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

People who seek power being more scared that being exploitative has consequences, so they limit exploitation.

Or you just bias the power vacuum to be filled with even more paranoid and ruthless nutjobs, because the more sensible psychopaths choose to avoid the consequences you are proposing. We see this fairly consistently when authoritarian governments get coup'd - the person most likely to take the place of a bloodthirsty dictator who knows he could get assassinated at any moment is an even more bloodthirsty future dictator.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

When authoritarian governments get coup'd and there is external influence seeking to further destabilize. Also every authoritarian dictator needs a class of people loyal to the regime, who fall into the category of people wanting power but also staying alive.

We also see many dictators that got more paranoid over time as they ruled too long, because there was no opposition to keep them in check until things exploded fully.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago

You don't need to be a billionaire to eat the rich, but it definitely helps to insulate you from the legal ramifications thereof.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

If the Big, Beautiful Bill in the US gets passed in the Senate with the provision requiring plaintiffs to put up a bond to sue the government over these illegal actions then I'd be bankrolling every citizen and group that is interested in suing to fight them, including putting up a bond.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Take a page out of the Republican playbook and start buying judges so I can own the courts in 30 to 40 years

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

$5b wouldn't do much in the grand scheme of things but it would make me the wealthiest person in my city 10x over. I'd fund progressive campaigns across the board to stack the legislate with like-minded people and then work on building my local community and hope that it has leeching effects on the surrounding area, state(s), country.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

I feel like we have very different beliefs on what "grand scheme of things" means because I don't believe $5b will make an immediate difference right away for most people, but you can implement small things that will create ripple effects that greatly change the grand scheme of things for the future.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 hours ago

5 billion is a lot, but it's not quite change the world money.

I'm not looking to go on a murder spree, even if there are people out there who might deserve it. Not to mention that going after other billionaires is basically the one thing that billions of dollars can't insulate you from.

I'd probably find an underserved region of the world, start up a hospital and health clinic, pay for good doctors, and treat patients for free for as long as we still have money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'd create a new city from scratch, sort of kick-starter style with like-minded residents and businesses. It would be built up with good public transit from the beginning and solid anti-NIMBY policies. Something radical like not being able to own your property. Instead the city would be owned collectively and you could have shares. But you would never have an incentive to deny development to increase your own home's value.

There'd be participatory planning and cutting edge democracy: participatory, deliberative, representative.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

I honestly don’t think you could do this with $5 billion unless you want it to be for like a couple hundred people

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)
  1. I would set up a program where the teachers in Philadelphia public schools would have their school supplies highly subsidized by myself.

  2. The local food banks would receive five figure donations directly from myself.

  3. I would look into water retention and distribution in drought stricken parts of Mexico. If I could help I would leverage my money effectively to make sure humans have access to safe drinking water in the region. If acting directly would cause harm I would fund researchers until an appropriate solution could be found.

  4. Create an app that teaches the indigenous languages of the Americas while hiring native speakers for accuracy.

Edit:

  1. Donate to an owl sanctuary.
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I like your very targeted responses!

With money in the billions, I agree that I couldn't not help fellow humans first.

Your proposals also have some fairly immediate benefits to a number of different groups of underserved people.

And then you even came back in the end to include some of the critters as well!

I like your style.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If I got billions of dollars at this point how could I not throw a little at the owls. I would feel guilty everyday I open my subscriptions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 53 minutes ago

It is a nice feeling to see it means something to all of you!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t even know where to begin. I’d rather just opt out and keep living my current lifestyle than dedicate the rest of my life to something I’m not an expert in - and honestly, don’t even find particularly interesting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

That is very fair.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Bribe politicians to add a constitutional amendment for a mandatory 30% minimum tax to gross income over $1M and assets/holdings over $1B.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I truly don't believe $5b is anywhere close to being enough to do that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The requirement to pass is only a 2/3 majority. $5b might be enough.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

3/4 state legislatures, good luck.

You could just skip the constitution and do a coup and seize power, its already out the window anyways.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 39 minutes ago

Yeah, one thing the Trump admin has taught me is that our constitution actually doesn't mean shit. Not to us as American citizens and not to the government that swore to uphold it. We've all just been pretending to care about it until someone with a god complex decided to challenge us.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago

Heal the sick, teach the young, power the future.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Free mental health care for those struggling the most plus housing subsidies for those struggling to stay off the street due to mental illness.

[–] reluctant_squidd 3 points 3 hours ago

Use it to hire most of the best minds to be found with the sole purpose of creating an expansive infrastructure to provide regular people the means to organize as one.

The undertaking would be staggering. Reviewing all the known history of man, considering all the languages, cultures, failures and successes.

Researching and combining all known technologies.

All to set the groundwork for a global union of human kind to be able to collectively counteract the disease that is the upper most classes.

After much daydreaming on the subject. I think this is the way of long term existential survival for the human race.

TL;DR: Basically, the Star Trek federation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Found a for-profit (to circumnavigate laws about non-profit having to be apolitical) with the goal of lifting people in poverty from poverty by providing jobs, education and zero interest loans

[–] hddsx 1 points 2 hours ago

527 organizations don’t have to be apolitical?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I would build housing for the homeless. Simple rule, no muss no fuss: need a place to live? Get a place to live. Live there for free until you can get clean and/or find a job and get back on your feet. Maybe throw in some job training too, or some kind of work-study program where they can get (paid, ofc) experience while they learn a new trade to help cover gaps in their work history and such. I'm imagining apartment complexes built around some kind of combination trade school/recovery program that teaches people to be plumbers, welders, electricians, etc while helping to get and keep them clean, offer group support for reintegrating into society, the full package.

I could help a lot of people that way with $5 billion. I'd show up in places like NY/LA with large homeless populations with a greyhound bus that said 'free apartment and a good job this way' on the side or something too, and just bus 'em in as new housing became available.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I wanted to do something similar to your apartment idea but for teens and young adults in poverty-stricken areas. Get them into a stable environment, teach them the necessary life skills like credit management, budgeting, cooking for yourself, etc. and give them job training. All of that would also go just as well for the homeless population. I grew up in an area that was riddled by the crack epidemic and had no resources for kids/teenagers to do anything other than crimes. The city didn't pay for anything to keep us out of trouble, and our drug addict parents sure weren't going to do it either. So I always felt like if I had a ton of money I would focus on program to help teens in those situations learn to be proper adults, because nobody else is teaching them. Schools won't, parents won't, we're defunding every program that helps outside of the home. It's a mess.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

That sounds pretty good too, yeah. The program could be expanded to include safe spaces/training for teenagers and such too, probably include a rec center that always has stuff going on for them to participate in, etc. At that point it turns from a housing/job training project to basically a community, built around safe spaces, opportunities, and education for the future.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

I'd immediately invest most of it in stable, developed economies where the far-right doesn't seem close to taking power—so somewhere like Finland or Singapore—and invest the rest in Syria because God knows they need it. This way I'll have a permanent stream of change-the-world money that I can use to support pro-democracy and worker organization efforts in the third world and in countries such as Turkey where there are serious efforts to democratize. With whatever remains from that I'd then go around funding relief efforts in Africa and the like.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You get to keep enough to maintain a very modest lifestyle in a low-cost-of-living area

Don't know why I must move to a cheap area... no, I would probably decide to stay here at least for half of each year. My lifestyle remains modest as well, but I would actually rebuild some parts of this old house.

the rest of it has to go towards improving the world in some way.

There's only a small part of the world that I could actually influence so far in my life.

With the billions, I would try to expand this radius of course, but only slowly, only reluctantly, trying to stay wise. I would focus at first on the ones that are closer to me, and mitigate their needs. You did not require me to improve the whole world after all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, cheap area will likely be a not-so-desirable place, unless you’re the type who likes to live in the boonies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Thats the point.

The money isn't for you, and you don't get any of the benefits of having it. The only reason I allowed for a stipen for a modest living in a cheap area is because I knew that half the comments would be "First I buy land build houses for me and all my friends and family, buy everyone cars, and fund all their colleges, then with the hundred million left over, I'll help some homeless people" OR if I would have said you get no money at all, everyone would have said they wouldn't have time to do anything good because they still had to work full time and half to afford their bills. So, the compromise is you get a modest lifestyle in an undesirable area fully funded, or no money at all and you can continue to work full time and a half to afford your basic ass lifestyle while not helping anyone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Edit: Given the previous rules that you must maintain a very modest lifestyle in a low-cost-of-living area,

It said that I get money for such a lifestyle.

But now you add that I must actually move before I even get that little money.

You definitely want to clarify your "Question".

would you rather choose to opt out and not have the money at all?

No, I would still play that game, but maybe my way of spending would concentrate even more on those where I expect something back.

you can continue to work full time and a half

I don't have that.

your basic ass lifestyle while not helping anyone.

I don't have that either.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Step 1) Pay my rent for the next 10 years. Freaking out about it month to month is shredding years off of my life span. Also buy a new hard drive because I ran out of space for memes earlier today...

Step 2) Go to the grocery store and get a shitload of groceries, distilled water and cat food so that isn't a concern for a long time. I can not eat. The cat? Not so much.

Step 3) At the grocery store, buy every single gift card they have. I mean all of them, not just the ones on the shelves. I'd go to the manager and say to get someone for me and me alone. Open a till and go through every box of every gift card, activate them all and sell all of them to me. ALL OF THEM.

Step 4) Go to every food bank in my city and give them every gift card as well as a massive cash donation. Some of the gift cards are for the staff. Otherwise 30% goes to various purchases that will help if they wanna keep the cash for a while. The other 70% gets put in with stuff that people pick up.

Step 5) Find every charity in my local area and pay them out. Reach their goals and then some.

Step 6) Make an agreement with the city to fund an ENTIRE overhaul of the transit system. My city isn't very big but the transit here is horrific. City won't make moves on it because cost of shifting it around will mess with the budget. So, I pay for it and over the course of a very long time, I take an incredibly small amount of any money gained from transit over the amount they made prior to overhaul. That money does not go to me but instead back into those local charities.

Step 7) Open my own vet clinic that has pricing based off of income. It'd be about the same prices as any other vets in the area overall, but if you make below a certain amount then the price drops. Keeps dropping based on how much you make. So much so that if you are homeless (as I used to be) with no income at all, you can have your furry friend treated at no charge. Hire someone who is exceptionally good at destroying competition and have them do absolutely everything in their power to obliterate any other vet clinics in the area. Absolutely fucking destroy them until they can no longer function because they simply do not have enough patients. Only those with no other option than to go to them because of travel distance. When they are utterly desperate and about to be foreclosed on, give them a generous payout as well as a hiring offer. Convert their location into another branch of my own with the same low income stipulations. No one deserves to be worried about their friend simply because they cannot afford it.

Step 8) Hire a bunch of Star Trek actors to come to Newfoundland for the biggest Trek convention ever, ideally by having the Star Trek cruise set off from there after a big blowout. Brings in a ton of tourism from nerds with disposable income and as we have some pretty exceptional views you don't get anywhere else, we can cross over the tourism WITH the Trek. Make a big festival saying it's a new planet or something. This is 100% just personal love but it can help the island too so why not?

Step 9) Invest in small-scale renewables and set up programs to help lower-income people lower their electricity costs (heating in my area is all electric so the prices are fucking absurd in winter). Have solar panels or whatever else hooked up with peoples homes and have the programs set to help mantain them at a minimal cost, ideally at least 30% lower than current electricity costs. That's about $400 a year saved.

Step 10) Make some deal with the provincial government to get the moose fences set up faster. It's a local thing.

Step 11) ALL REMAINING MONEY is to be invested in trains on the island. Absolutely none exist at the moment. We shut down the railway in Newfoundland in the 80s or 90s. First off, I'm autistic and love trains. Second, trains would make travel around this island insanely fucking easy. Requires more upkeep with the weather but as it stands the road system is awful, it takes too long to transport anything anywhere and we only have one bus route that crosses the island. It sucks and is a miserable experience. Set up a train hub at Port-Aux-Basques with spidering networks that go out to the various hotspots on the island.

Edit: Lmao the downvotes are hysterical

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I honestly don't know.

My first thought was hiring PMCs/wet work specialists to take care of some particular people (but what if they get a counteroffer and they change their minds? Even the 5 billion might be nothing compared to what these people could offer and it's not like the people doing this kind of job have a moral compass and care about the great good on average, lol) and put some fear in their hearts. I guess if they don't fear God, they'll certainly fear for their lives (you can't be a hedonist if you're dead after all). But would that work? Would the ones remaining take care of spinning this in a way that brings the proles even closer to them? Trump and his team have been able to do it after all. But this is a necessary step to control public discourse and create enough fear that those at the top fear for their lives, act a little bit better and cannibalize each other at the top in the chaos.

The second step would require/involve making people fear God (believe you'll be judged for your actions by the Merciful, the Gracious after death so you work good deeds and avoid evil). I don't think that's possible, at least not for me. After all, every sort of moral teaching and parable has already been made and it's out there, for free. Maybe if they understood that Voltaire was right, and we'd have to invent God if He didn't exist FOR OUR OWN COLLECTIVE GOOD IN THIS WORLD, maybe that would be enough. But how? Voltaire was right, but I don't have to invent Him, I'd just have to remind people of Him enough (but I'd need a literate populace and that's a dying breed)... Maybe the PMCs should focus on big people in the media and spin but wouldn't someone else just fill their shoes? Anyway, in the end, I don't know, lol. I don't know how to make an impact in the world to make it better in the long term to such a magnitude, not with 5 billion. Maybe 500, and then I'd have some chats with the Chinese to take care of the PMCs before they get out of control or something (they get to showcase/try out their toys, the rest of the world gets rid of an actual/extremely possible danger of military dictatorship).

load more comments
view more: next ›