this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
1408 points (97.6% liked)

Science Memes

14232 readers
4095 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 56 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also you DON'T FUCKING WANT GRAPHITE DUST FLOATING AROUND IN ZERO G

[–] pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Why not? I'm not well versed in the theme. Would it be flammable?

edit: just saw another post mentioning this: lack of gravity, enter floating in the electronic, causing short circuits as main risk.

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also your body doesn't do a good job of breaking it down either. Id imagine that in your lungs would suck.

I have a piece of graphite in my leg from 7th grade still. I'm 33.

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I have a graphite stain in my palm from 8th grade and I'm 40.

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Left handed or did you get stabbed too?

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The theme is to pretend recently-learned information was available half a century ago, and also to ignorantly inflate its importance. It turns out exposure to graphite dust in large concentrations can cause respiratory problems (like any kind of dust), but the amount of graphite emitted into the air by pencil use is insignificant, even in zero gravity.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 508 points 4 days ago (9 children)

The reason not to use pencils in Space wasn't that Pencil are inflamable, the main reason was the graphit dust produced by Pencils, which because of the lack of gravity, enter floating in the electronic, causing short circuits as main risk.

[–] ninja@lemmy.world 267 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 50 points 4 days ago (7 children)

That is something I found weird, too. Inflammable and flammable mean the same thing!

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

Technically, I think they're different. Flammable means that it can be lit on fire, like wood or something. Whereas inflammable means it can catch fire on its own, like gas, for example.

Edit: after some googling, it appears that my source was shit and should be disregarded. They do indeed appear to be synonyms. And also, I was thinking of gasoline. I think I was thinking of the "gas pedal" and that threw me off.

[–] glups@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago

Credit to you for the self-correction though

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago

Synonyms, true synonyms. No real difference between them (except don't use inflammable in safety situations, for above reasons)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 27 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Probably not great for eyes or noses or filtration systems either

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 4 days ago

Also a broken bit of lead could easily float into someone's eye or get aspirated.

[–] copd@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Genuine question. why did you choose to use "inflammable" instead of "flammable"?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 188 points 4 days ago (18 children)

Besides that, NASA wasn't the one that funded the research behind the pen, they bought the completed pens. The expenses for the research were funded by Fisher

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

For decades these pens have been brought up to criticize wasteful spending, inaccurately. Fisher Price didn't even develop the pens for NASA, they were just a sales gimmick, and NASA didn't spend thousands of dollars each on them, they just bought them. Space flight was getting a lot of publicity back then, so products that related themselves to space were popular, like Space Food Sticks - tootsie-rollish snacks supposedly full of protein and nourishment. To me they tasted too much like raw flour. "Energy" of course was a euphemism for sugar.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)

also, fucking pencil shavings?

pencil shavings contain graphite (great for getting into shit and shorting shit out) and thin paper (think, kindling)

did the russians gnaw the fucking things sharp? no? idiots...

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (13 children)

Grease pencil, you pull a tab and the things unrolls.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 92 points 4 days ago (12 children)

Plus, inhaling graphite dust since it doesn't fall doesn't sound fun.

[–] Tiptopit@feddit.org 69 points 4 days ago

Plus, graphite dust and electronics are also not a great combination.

[–] termaxima@jlai.lu 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s carbon dust, which your body is pretty good at dealing with, and in quantities so trivial you probably already inhale more currently than you would using a pencil in an otherwise mostly sterile spaceship (at least sterile compared to earth)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] holycrap@lemm.ee 63 points 4 days ago (1 children)

NASA used crayons before those space pens, and iirc the pens were available for a while before they tried them

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

NASA used crayons before those space pens, and iirc the pens were available for a while before they tried them

this is partially correct; the missing pertinent bit - there was a crayon shortage due to the influx of marines recruited for the vietnam war (mmm crayola), forcing NASA to seek alternatives.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I’ve owned a fair few Fisher Space Pens throughout the years. It’s an interesting bit of space memorabilia that’s functional and affordable. It’s an impressive bit of engineering.

As a space nerd, I love the pen. As a pen guy…. There’s better options. The cartridge just doesn’t write as smooth as I like, nor is it a really bold, saturated line. For daily actual writing use, I use a Lamy Safari rollerball or a Pilot B2P.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Think of how revolutionary crayola twistables would have been for NASA?

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 7 points 3 days ago (6 children)

So they could have infinite chunks of broken crayan floating around them. I can never not break those no matter how lite I use rhem

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 35 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Apollo 1 resulted in a lot of improvements regarding fire safety.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

People drag the Soviets for being reckless with the lives of their crews, but forget that the USA melted three men in a training exercise.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

at least those three were known, acknowledged and not covered in secrecy.

we really have no idea how many the sov's lost in their rush to stay ahead / catch up to the moon landings. truly, there's no way to fucking know, even the cosmonauts themselves never knew the total extent.

maybe they both deserve to be dragged a bit eh? pfft

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 4 days ago (10 children)

This is inaccurate. Graphite is not flammable. It forms small particles that, mixed with air, could combust in a dust explosion, just like flour.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 27 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I'm probably just being dense but what's the difference between being flammable and being susceptible to combustion?

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 22 points 4 days ago

In technical safety terms, combustibles are harder to ignite than flammables. So diesel and olive oil are combustibles, for example, because neither of them give off enough ignitable vapour at room temperature. Ethanol does, so it gets classified as flammable, and you need to store and handle it more carefully than diesel. Then there's really horrible stuff like triethylborane which will catch fire upon meeting oxygen even at temperatures well below the freezing point of water

Of course in casual usage they mean the same thing

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (6 children)

They’re referring to the relationship between surface area and combustion. Talc, for example, melts but does not burn. Talc powder can ignite if blown over an open flame.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

You're not dense for asking a question. Without asking questions, it's Impossible to learn.

The flash point is different. The flash point is the temperature that is necessary to create enough vapor for the substance to ignite.

Flammable material has a low flash point, which means it catches on fire easily. Think gasoline. Combustibles need a higher initial temperature, but eventually they will burn and sustain the burning until running out. Think wood.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's a cool pen. "Btw, this pen was the same type of pen used by Astronauts"; I mean, how's that for a conversation starter 😁

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Conversation starter, or an entire episode of Seinfeld

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments