this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
326 points (97.7% liked)

politics

20522 readers
4195 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 109 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Great plan… use diversity training as a tool to identify generals who might not be loyal, purge them and put stooges in place. This has worked out really well for Russias military.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 months ago

This working out great for the Russian military could be the reason behind the plan.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Tell me how this isn’t fascism again ?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Cause when Republicans do the fascism, it's not fascism, it's just conservative values.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago

same_picture.jpeg

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

It's only called fascism when it's from the fascist region. Otherwise, it's sparkling conservatism.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I am interested to see their written definition of "woke".

[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You know there won't be one, and this is just a vehicle to do military purges, right?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

Some conservative tried explaining it and I recall she basically settled it being defined as critical thinking.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

There won't be one. It'll be a commissariat type situation that completely fucks our military for decades.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Didn't DeSantis (or his lawyer anyway) define it as 'knowing there are systemic injustices and wanting to address them' or something like it? I found it funny when I read that. Back when I was still on reddit, there was of course a huge SelfAwarewolves post about it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Which means calling something "woke" is also calling out what you perceive as systematic injustices in society.

So being anti-woke is woke in of itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

“something im afraid of, and/or something i don’t understand”

[–] [email protected] 43 points 4 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 4 months ago

A dystopian nanny state. www.vote.gov

[–] [email protected] 41 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Can you fucking imagine clocking into work at the Anti-woke Task Force office? Wearing an Anti-woke Task Force uniform??!!

This might be my halloween costume...

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sexy anti-woke task force officer?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If it's an Anti-woke uniform I imagine it'll have a vinyl window over the crotch so everyone can see that you're going into the bathroom that matches your genitalia. And of course it'll have a flame thrower so you can burn all the books. You'll probably need the skin color chart from Family Guy; better add grey and green on there to identify the extra-terrestrial aliens. Don't forget your shoes must have heels because all the best Anti-woke crusaders wear heels!

Hmm, what else...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

The window over my genitals must reveal my chastity cage, obviously.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Sooooo... A task force of racists?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

How dare you. They'll also be sexist and homophobic. And xenophobic. And aporophobic. And transphobic.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

We need a new word for people with all the phobias. Bigot has lost its oomph, the pizaz, the gravitas.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

You don't have enough of that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, cause our fucking military is too woke. Stfu.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I didn't use to be able to decode narcissism at a glance, but basically he's mad that Mad Dog Mattis and his colleagues didn't bend the knee.

Honestly I have never been so accepting of the armed forces as when Mattis openly shunned Trump.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Not just Mattis. He tried to order the active duty military to go after protestors in D.C. They reminded him of their oath and the Posse Comitatus Act. At volume. In the Oval Office. Then they released a force wide memo reminding everyone their oath was to the Constitution, not the President.

He's never forgiven the military for that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Like when under Arab spring the Egyptian politicians tried to get the military involved to stop the protests, and got back (paraphrased)

"Our primary job is to protect the Egyptian people from violence. You really don't want us involved in this"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Despite all my deep resentments about our war-like ways, they earned a measure of respect for that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The military has a lot of bad things. But they are loyal to their own moral code. For an organization mostly made of people who wandered in from the street desperate for money or glory, I think that's pretty neat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Most of the bad shit they've done, has been because idiots outside of uniform thought it was politically helpful to them.

We need to stop ordering them to do bad shit and actually try to think before we send them places.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

That's probably like 60 percent of it. They've definitely got internal problems like their sexual assault, suicide, and burn out rates. Also it can be a pretty toxic environment if you aren't a lean runner body type or don't conform to their culture. There's also a gang problem on some bases. So yeah, they have bad things going on even without politicians giving them screwed up orders.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

That's a line they actually use. They usually pair it with pictures of combat soldiers partying in My Little Pony costumes.

They forget that those same guys would annihilate their backwoods militia before lunch if it came down to a fight.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago

You mean political officers? Like we see on the tvs in all Russia subs...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I read it that way too..... honestly wouldn't surprise me in the least if he did say genitals

[–] FunderPants 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Operation Generals Genital General Inspection for Operations is a go.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

"Maybe if I'm an even bigger, sadder bitch, then they'll all tell me how great I am."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't know why you need a military task force to monitor genitals

[–] OutlierBlue 4 points 4 months ago

Because there are a lot of people obsessed with other people's genitals who are currently unemployed. Find the job you love.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

He wants to have the military be controlled on his every whim. Expect those that don't comply (and didn't in 2020) to be labed as woke and removed.

I hope by that point if that happens I know our armed men and women have been trained to not miss.....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

Thats straight out of the communist playbook with political commissars. Think Russia just reinstated that?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Handmaids tale, where we come

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Let me guess. D.O.G.E - Department of General Endorsement.

Grok. Generate an AI picture of Trenchcoat Musk with 50% less gut.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

The ~~"task force"~~ political office won't be looking for "woke." They'll be looking to identify and remove generals who won't follow illegal orders.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

what is this even mean? I don't know what this means. I can't do it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He wants to fire the military and replace it with loyalists. Can't coup without a willing military. He gets in, that move will be paramount.

Just another of his blunders, that's a move you wouldn't announce ahead of time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Fascism.

He is pandering to fascists.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is this just him saying he wants to reinstate DADT, but with extra steps?

The US military has specifically benefited from diversity and inclusivity programs in recent years. The actual size of the US military force is comparatively smaller than in the past, and being more inclusive has benefited the institution in the concrete way of just having a larger number of potential enlistees to pull from.

I'm all for reducing the size of the US military, but to be clear that's the only effect this will have.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No.

It’s private bone spurs being big tough guy for the MAGATs. It means nothing, it is nothing, but if everything goes to fucking shit again one of his evil toadies might try some ignorant loyalty-test bullshit to fuck up the military, yeah.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›