this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
431 points (99.3% liked)

politics

22813 readers
5008 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Trump administration said it would not provide information on how it will get a wrongly deported Maryland dad home by a Friday morning deadline because the timeframe a judge imposed was “impracticable.”

In effect, the Department of Justice (DOJ) is openly defying a court order that requires it to provide details about 29-year-old Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s whereabouts and how he will be brought back stateside.

“The Supreme Court has spoken quite clearly, and yet I can’t get an answer,” said Judge Paula Xinis.

“We must heed the Supreme Court and get him back,” Rep. Jamie Raskin said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The judge needs to put Pam Bondi in a holding cell for contempt until Garcia is back in her courtroom.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

pam bondi is beholden to trump, because he bribed her to drop the trump lawsuit case against him.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Do you think he’s dead or they just don’t want an exposé of the conditions?

Or that diplomatic channels prevent it? Lol.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 day ago

Whether he's alive or not, it's more that they don't care and don't want to be told they have to do anything by some liberal activist judge.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'd argue they might be testing the waters to see how much they can get away with. It could be a logistics thing, but I doubt it. I highly doubt they care one way or another about the individual.

This could be a blatant test on how far their power will extend. People haven't been saying "authoritarian" and "threat to democracy" for the past few months just for the fun of it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yes, I think this is a first test to see how far they can stretch things with the law and deport people without justification at all.
By extension it tests the current regimes ability and efficiency on how easily they can remove people. When it is clear there are no legal roadblocks and delays the shipping containers and "train transports" will come out.....

Also, I don't think he's dead, might have been beaten and barely fed.
But they most likely will have no knowledge about his status or direct whereabouts at all, might even be handed over to El Salvador's prison anonymously. Regimes in such prisons usually strip all identity anyway.

[–] Revan343 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But they most likely will have no knowledge about his status or direct whereabouts at all, might even be handed over to El Salvador's prison anonymously. Regimes in such prisons usually strip all identity anyway.

Yep. Why keep track of the prisoners you never plan to let out?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it's logistics. They threw him in a pit with a hundred other guys. Maybe you can find the one who will claim he's supposed to get out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I'm sparticus

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He very well could be dead, but I think the primary thing happening here is they want to create the precedent that they can't bring anyone back from this prison. That way, they can start sending "undesirable" American citizens "by mistake" and then just be able to say "not our problem".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

If he comes back, he'll talk. And it won't be good.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

It's because they're fascists and don't want to

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probably not dead, probably being leveraged by el Salvador because Trump has no choice.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trump paid to send them there, and plans to even send American citizens.

US has its own prisons, and many are for profit, so they generate money from prisoners.

Now questions is why would we send people to a foreign country, and pay them to keep prisoners?

The answer is simple: CECOT is used to outsource getting rid of people. And unless US continuously pays them to hold them (which I doubt it was more than one time fee), CECOT has no benefit of keeping those people alive.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

It's used to remove them from the protections of a US citizen on us property the same as gitmo which is why gitmo is expanding to 30k prisoners. They're testing the waters without having to risk all the bullshit at gitmo at the same time. It's shitty but it's not likely to be a literal death camp specifically because no one is going to continue paying if they know that they're dead. Duh.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

They don’t want him back because he’s not aryan.

Oh sorry wrong fascists. Same principle though

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

A lot of things are pointing that this likely is a death camp.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Emphisis on this: the judge didn't even order to bring him back. The judge ordered them to outline the steps to bring him back. The Trump Admin can't even do that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Start issuing arrest warrants for contempt of court to members of the administration, ICE, and any other member of any department who was involved in the process. Shotgun tactics. Go for area effect. See what sticks. This is the time for judges who actually give a shit to go all-in on the maximal exercise of their power.

Remember: Canp Auschwitz was in Poland, not Germany.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Insert Trump blanket pardon here...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

He can't pardon civil contempt.

Until SCOTUS says otherwise, that is.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Just need to have them sent to el Salvador to serve the time for a contempt charge. Then there won't be anything that can be done (according to the very same doj lawyers)

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The judges have power to enforce it.

If they do not, then the tyranny has almost complete power.

If they do, I suspect that violence will occur. I believe this is the outcome Trump is hoping for, because then he can skip the "almost" and completely sieze it through violent means.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What precisely are the next steps in this process? If the SC has ruled, and they aren't complying, do you charge the Secretary of State with contempt and send them to jail until they comply?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

The only way this ends in a sane world is the Supreme Court appointing marshals to arrest people.

I think you and I both know the number of bad possible outcomes outnumber the positive number of outcomes... and I think that applies to this entire presidency

I'm .. tired.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

In a society where The Constitution means something, yes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

It doesn't have to be the Secretary of State. It only has to be people with the authority to solve the problem. Preferably several of them.

[–] CobraChicken3000 13 points 1 day ago

Cool, it's been some time since our last constitutional crisis.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The entire budget for ICE +10% needs to be confiscated and paid to the victims and their families every single day until they are returned to the US.

None of those fucks get paid until all the legal residents are back. Miss 1 person? No pay.

This would be the minimum penalty on a functional government where this shit was done by accident.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

When asked why such basic tasks are impractical they will say "just look at how incompetent we are!"

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So, what happens when the administration just does nothing like they have so far?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't let the lawyers leave the court room. They should go straight to a cell for contempt.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Should. But who's gonna send them there? Same with Trump at this point, who can arrest him?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A strongly written memo will be considered.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

He's not coming back. Trump is going to Andrew Jackson this shit

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

...I don't suppose there's any hope in El Salvador stepping up to do the right thing regardless of whatever bullshit is happening in the US, is there?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yippee, constitutional crisis #1!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Number one!? I don't think we're even in the double digits anymore ...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

It's been a constitutional crisis, it just gets more crisisy.

[–] wirebeads 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

America is rotten to its core.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

...and now it's falling apart.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Almost like the cruelty was the point.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Power grab. The judicial branch is a co-equal part of the government, along with the executive and legislative ones. Y'all protesting and marching with me...?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›