this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
1028 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

15143 readers
1295 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hperrin 165 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Imagine shipping this tiny little box and it weighs 60 pounds. Poor mailman.

[–] [email protected] 107 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Last package of the da... Yo wtf?!?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's the 32 KG mop all over again

Note: Above video is marketing for an exercise plan, but it's also funny to watch occasionally when he has new episodes. As far as I know, the weights are real, but they're always loaded funny in the videos. Max plates visually for the weight the dudes are lifting

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

"I have to clean here!" - lifts fat barbell, that some steroid man just lifted with both hands, with one hand and moves it elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Not to be a killjoy but your basic mailman has a pretty low weight limit on the parcels they take.

[–] [email protected] 151 points 1 month ago (2 children)

USPS GOAT. Fuck privatización.

[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 month ago (3 children)

But sometimes I have mildly inconveniencing experiences with the postal service in my extremely rural town that require me to navigate my extremely rural town's nearly non-existent public services so we should absolutely surrender complete control to Amazon

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 month ago

Private companies love the heartland and will work out of patriotism even if rural routes are less profitable! 🤡

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We recently moved in a very rural area. The rural carrier for our new route gave us a form to fill out, and by the end of the week we were receiving mail. UPS and FedEX on the other hand, wouldn't deliver to us for a month. USPS will carry our packages up our driveway to our steps; UPS and FedEX throw them in the ditch by the mailbox.

Also, did you know you can buy stamps, cards, and envelopes directly from the rural carrier? Here's a fun quote from the rural customer registration form:

Rural carriers maintain a supply of stamps, cards, and envelopes for sale. Additionally, your carrier will accept Certified Mail™, Registered Mail™, insure packages, and prepare money orders. Generally, rural carriers can extend practically all services available at a Post Office. Please purchase a sufficient supply of stamps and affix proper postage on all outgoing mail.

Imagine how bleak things would be if Amazon was running the show. USPS is truly the best

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Apparently neither of you are aware of how dense I am. ;)

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But do you fit into that box? 🤔

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Nothing one of those fancy new blenders couldn't handle.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

I have mixed feelings about this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (4 children)

first, ya cut a hole in that box...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 94 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wait until I fill that box with quark-gluon plasma.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I'll go one better.
A (non-spinning uncharged) black hole with diameter 1+5/8th inches (so it fits in the box) has a mass of about 2.3 earths.

(Near as I can tell QGP filling the whole box is around a ten billionth of that.)

Of course the box would Very quickly no longer be outside the black hole. QGP would also cause the box to no longer be a container in short order. To put it mildly.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

It would also reach its destination very quickly. Or rather the other way around. Free delivery.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 88 points 1 month ago (3 children)

8 5/8" x 5 3/8" x 1 5/8"

Don't write yourself off yet, learn metric.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For most of the rest of the world, that's about 219 mm × 137 mm × 41,3 mm

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 month ago (2 children)

For those of us that don’t use arbitrary made up units at all, that’s 1.35515609E+34 Planck Length x 8.477460474E+33 Planck Length x 2.555613997E+33 Plank Length.

Use real measurements. A meter is how far light travels in 1/299,792,458 of a second? Statements made by the utterly deranged.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

Finally a truly universally usable measurement for everyday use

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's only in your head you feel left out or looked down on...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

just try your best, try everything you can

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

moving from Europe to America the amount of times I'm like "it's 12 3/8ths" to try to, yknow, join in, and everyone's like "call it 12 or 13"

motherfucker that's a huge gap!

[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 month ago

at a typical temperature and pressure, sure.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It’s because all the packages have the same domestic weight limit.

Seems silly, but makes sense in the context.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is the case for most "Dumb laws": there's an outlier that becomes kinda silly, but it's not really worth the effort to change.

I saw one "It's illegal to hunt Blue Whales in Idaho". Because it's illegal to hunt endangered species in Idaho, and Blue Whales are endangered, not because legislators were super concerned about saving Idaho's whale population.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

He said "physically" which is wrong because Neutronium. What he possibly meant was "practically" in which Osmium would be the only element you can practically fit in the box since it isn't possible to synthesize neutronium at that amount or handle that much safely.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If mailing 70 lbs of unstable particles that can't exist outside of a lab is wrong, I don't wanna be right.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (4 children)

No you mean theoretical. As neutronium is a theoretical substance. To our knowledge there's no way to find it outside of neuron stars. It is therefore physically impossible, within our current state of knowledge.

It's highly unlikely, bordering on theoretically impossible to assume that mankind will be able to synthesize enough to fill a cardboard box with. Then the practical side says even if that was possible, there would probably no way a cardboard box could contain that (and a plethora of other practical impossibilities).

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Could you create a device that would compress some substance to the extent it would reach this weight or is that impossible?

[–] lemmyng 52 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Such devices exist, namely stars. Neutron stars are theorized to have neutronium at their core, essentially a soup of neutrons so densely packed that nothing else fits between them - in order words, the densest theoretical material (osmium is the densest material found on Earth).

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I guess I forgot to say it needs to fit in the package lol. I know it’s possible in extreme environments but can you create such an environment in this package is the question.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Just toss a few teaspoons of black hole in there.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I believe that would be some form of fusion

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Good news, it's 20-30 years away!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

you can balloon the box out a ways to get more volume

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The surface area of the box is about 135 inches. If this surface area were spread over a sphere, it would have a diameter of about 6.5 inches and a volume of nearly 150 cubic inches (nearly twice the volume of the uninflated box!). 150 cubic inches of osmium weighs about 120lbs.

So, indeed you could exceed the weight limit of the box by ballooning it out and filling it with something that's at least 7/12ths as dense as osmium (or a little more dense than lead).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Neutronium... I am having early 2000s trivia website flashbacks! Wasn't a teaspoon of that stuff several tons or something?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

At what velocity are the box's dimensions and effective mass determined?

load more comments
view more: next ›