this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
1985 points (98.9% liked)

memes

14755 readers
3499 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

What annoys me is that "doing your own research" actually makes sense in a lot of contexts. Our modern politics driven news is 90% bullshit and you're better off fact checking everything they say by looking at reliable sources and tracing the origin of dubious claims. But these people have ruined that by acting like "do your own research" means "blindly trust some guy with a podcast who tells you what you want to hear."

[–] phoenixz 12 points 6 days ago

I hate when people use the word "research" because most people think it's reading a Facebook page.

Real research requires nyears of studying to actually understand the subject before advancing the field. It requires sometimes year or decades of meticulously measuring and registering data, all while ensuring bias stays out of the data.

To 99% of people it's spending 5 minutes to find the right Facebook page that will confirm their preconceptions..its gross

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

When someone says that they usually want you to do their research, i.e. Find arguments supporting their claim because they're too stupid or lazy to communicate them. They don't actually want you to do the objective scientific research,they don't even want you to do a "Facebook research" on groups that don't align with their views.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 days ago (1 children)

因噎廢食 (īnyēfèishí)

https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E5%9B%A0%E5%99%8E%E5%BB%A2%E9%A3%9F

This is a Chinese proverb meaning "to avoid something essential because of a slight risk of making a mistake." Literally it means "to not eat due to the risk of choking on food."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

To quote from Wiktionary:

夫有以饐死者,欲禁天下之食,悖;有以乘舟死者,欲禁天下之船,悖;有以用兵喪其國者,欲偃天下之兵,悖。

It is nonsense to forbid the world’s people to eat just because one person has choked to death when eating; it is nonsense to put the world's boats in disuse just because someone has drowned while sailing; it is also nonsense to eliminate the world's military forces just because one sovereign has lost his state due to his military action

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago

Outstanding. This is what good satire looks like.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I was talking to a new friend who is a nurse yesterday, and she told me she worked in peds a bit last year during a measles outbreak in my city, during which one child died. She said she has never seen sicker children in her life, they were all unvaccinated, and that they all went home having lost so much ground. She says half the parents were just victims of disinformation but that many of them were super obnoxious.

[–] MystikIncarnate 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Interestingly, I have some nurses in the family and the rate at which people who are educated in healthcare, are anti-vax, is too damned high.

Which isn't to imply its a lot of people, but any nonzero amount of people, working in healthcare, who buy into anti-vax propaganda, is too many. You've been formally taught about this stuff. Yet, you're anti-vax because some person on Facebook/Twitter/whatever, fed you some bullshit about the "dangers"?? Wow. What the actual fuck.

[–] geekgrrl0 6 points 5 days ago

My sister left a really great hospital job (radiology tech) due to the vaccine mandates. Some people are so smart and yet so dumb.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I mean, this level of Darwinism would be fine. What grates me is not recognizing the effect it has on others.

Still seeking an analogy where not eating food somehow puts a neighbor or classmate at risk of starvation.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I stopped at a stop sign and somone almost rear-ended me. Had I driven through, I would have been safe. There is no reason to stop at stop signs. Other people can stop if they choose to, but the government can't force me to risk a rear-ending in order to protect someone else. Jesus wouldn't let me get T-boned in an intersection, I'm covered in his blood.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I thought you were dead serious for a bit

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How can you know for sure?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Cross paths with you at an intersection.

[–] MystikIncarnate 3 points 6 days ago

Herd immunity is pretty important.

The first of the crazy parents who went anti-vax benefitted greatly from Herd immunity. Now enough of them are not vaccinating that the herd immunity is basically non-existent. So we get things like measles outbreaks.

There are people who are medically incapable of getting vaccinated, like those with compromised immune systems (some might be in treatment for cancer)... And their best defense is if all of us, who can be immunized, are immunized.

Cancer treatments are not the only immunocompromising thing that can happen and not all immunocompromised people have cancer specifically.... For the record.

Anyone who is anti-vax should be aware that they are actively and intentionally putting other people at risk and that should be strongly and thoroughly documented; so when they bring in a cold/flu/COVID/measles/whatever preventable disease to the school and someone else's kid dies as a result the grieving family has the ability to sue them into poverty.

They deserve worse, but legally, I can't condone that.... But if someone wanted to take a page from a particular person named Luigi, I would be hard pressed to find a good reason to pursue any charges against them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

I feel like it's very perpetrated by Americans, and Americans are very ~~self-centered~~ individualistic

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Because food is dangerous, we've taken steps to ban supermarkets which distribute food.

Only a select few strictly regulated supermarkets will be allowed to distribute food.

We know some communities may struggle with reduced or no access to food because of this decision. However we deem this imperative in order to have a strong and healthy country.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

True, I usually refer to something similar: Do you know how many people die in bed every year? Perhaps we should ban beds.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Some of those foods include peanuts which are fine for most people but are deadly for others.

Also, some American companies have created some lab grown food that seems revolutionary, but still lacks long term health testing.

load more comments
view more: next ›